NAGENDRA vs RANGANATHA K V — 2057/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080022872025

e-Filing Number

19-07-2025

Filing Number

2057/2025

Filing Date

23-Jul-2025

Registration No

2057/2025

Registration Date

24-Jul-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAGENDRA

    Adv. H R MAHADEVA PRABHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANGANATHA K V

  2. 2.THE MANAGER, SRIRAMA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 2057/2025 Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Nagendra and respondents Ranganatha K V and Srirama General Insurance Company Limited for ₹4,50,000. The court found the compromise voluntary and legally enforceable, and directed the insurance company to deposit the full settlement amount to the petitioner without delay, considering his substantial medical expenses and injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 26-Nov-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 15-Oct-2025

    Appearance Of Party

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 31-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 23-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2057/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 2057/2025 Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Nagendra and respondents Ranganatha K V and Srirama General Insurance Company Limited for ₹4,50,000. The court found the compromise voluntary and legally enforceable, and directed the insurance company to deposit the full settlement amount to the petitioner without delay, considering his substantial medical expenses and injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case