ANAND C H vs CHANDRASHEKHARA C — 1885/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/SEC.166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080022562025

Filing Number

1885/2025

Filing Date

07-Jul-2025

Registration No

1885/2025

Registration Date

10-Jul-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/SEC.166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANAND C H

    Adv. B. RAMEGOWDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRASHEKHARA C

  2. 2.THE BRANCH MANAGER, ICICI LOMBARD MOTOR INSURANCE CO., LTD.,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Anand C H and respondent ICICI Lombard Motor Insurance Company for ₹5,25,000, disposing the petition. The court directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount without unreasonable delay, finding the petitioner competent to handle the money given his substantial medical expenses and injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 29-Oct-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 31-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 07-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1885/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Anand C H and respondent ICICI Lombard Motor Insurance Company for ₹5,25,000, disposing the petition. The court directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount without unreasonable delay, finding the petitioner competent to handle the money given his substantial medical expenses and injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case