GEETHA vs ARJUNA — 1964/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED OUTSIDE THE COURT on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080021862025

Filing Number

1964/2025

Filing Date

14-Jul-2025

Registration No

1964/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED OUTSIDE THE COURT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GEETHA

    Adv. K.V.YOGESH

  2. 2.SONA

  3. 3.NINGAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARJUNA

  2. 2.THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNITED INDIA VIMA COMPANY.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court accepted a joint settlement memo wherein the parties compromised for ₹22,25,000. The settlement amount was apportioned among the three petitioners (Geetha ₹12,00,000, Sona ₹6,00,000, Ningamma ₹4,25,000), with the entire amount to be released to petitioner Geetha (Sona and Ningamma consenting via affidavit) to clear loans. The court directed United India Vima Company to deposit the settlement amount promptly and disposed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Settlement

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 26-Nov-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  9. 10-Oct-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  10. 19-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 14-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1964/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted a joint settlement memo wherein the parties compromised for ₹22,25,000. The settlement amount was apportioned among the three petitioners (Geetha ₹12,00,000, Sona ₹6,00,000, Ningamma ₹4,25,000), with the entire amount to be released to petitioner Geetha (Sona and Ningamma consenting via affidavit) to clear loans. The court directed United India Vima Company to deposit the settlement amount promptly and disposed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case