MANJUNATHA.G vs MOHAMMED SHABUDDIN — 1294/2022

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 30-Jun-2026

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080021832022

Filing Number

1319/2022

Filing Date

05-Sep-2022

Registration No

1294/2022

Registration Date

05-Sep-2022

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJUNATHA.G

    Adv. H.R.MAHADEVA PRABHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED SHABUDDIN

  2. 2.THE MANAGER, GO DIGIT GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

    Adv. Mithun VG

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  3. 22-May-2026

    Arguments

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 04-May-2026

    Arguments

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Summons

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Summons

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  10. 02-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  11. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  12. 23-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  13. 29-Sep-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  14. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  15. 04-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    This document records witness testimony in MVC.NO. 1294/2022, a motor vehicle accident compensation case. Dr. N. Karunakara, an orthopedic surgeon, testified on 04.09.2025 regarding petitioner Manjunatha.G's injuries (fractures of right leg and left foot treated with surgery on right leg and conservative treatment on left foot). During cross-examination by respondent's counsel, the witness faced questioning about documentation gaps, disability assessment methodology (22% right limb, 11% left limb disability calculated using 2024 guidelines), and lack of evidence of muscle loss, though he maintained the disability assessment was conducted properly and denies exaggerating claims. The document shows witness testimony concluding with no re-examination; no final judgment or order is provided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  17. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  18. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  19. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  20. 30-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  21. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  22. 02-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  23. 05-Apr-2025

    IssueView PDF

  24. 05-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  25. 14-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  26. 11-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  27. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  28. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  29. 06-Dec-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  30. 06-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  31. 07-Nov-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  32. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  33. 04-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  34. 14-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  35. 05-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  36. 12-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  37. 23-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  38. 01-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  39. 06-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  40. 24-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  41. 28-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  42. 07-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  43. 20-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  44. 03-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  45. 18-Jan-2024

    Summons

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  46. 29-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  47. 09-Dec-2023

    OrdersView PDF

  48. 09-Dec-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  49. 29-Nov-2023

    Settlement

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  50. 08-Nov-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  51. 17-Oct-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  52. 26-Sep-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  53. 24-Aug-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  54. 26-Jul-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  55. 08-Jul-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  56. 06-May-2023

    Settlement

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  57. 06-Apr-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  58. 02-Mar-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  59. 03-Feb-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  60. 13-Jan-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  61. 29-Dec-2022

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  62. 28-Nov-2022

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  63. 29-Oct-2022

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  64. 06-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. 05-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1294/2022

casestatus.in Summary

This document records witness testimony in MVC.NO. 1294/2022, a motor vehicle accident compensation case. Dr. N. Karunakara, an orthopedic surgeon, testified on 04.09.2025 regarding petitioner Manjunatha.G's injuries (fractures of right leg and left foot treated with surgery on right leg and conservative treatment on left foot). During cross-examination by respondent's counsel, the witness faced questioning about documentation gaps, disability assessment methodology (22% right limb, 11% left limb disability calculated using 2024 guidelines), and lack of evidence of muscle loss, though he maintained the disability assessment was conducted properly and denies exaggerating claims. The document shows witness testimony concluding with no re-examination; no final judgment or order is provided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case