RENUKA vs KIRAN.M.M. — 1862/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S.166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080021342025
Filing Number
1867/2025
Filing Date
04-Jul-2025
Registration No
1862/2025
Registration Date
08-Jul-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RENUKA
Adv. K.S. RAJAGOPAL
-
2.NAGESHA
-
3.RAJESHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.KIRAN.M.M.
-
2.SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., MYSURU-570 009.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between petitioners Renuka, Nagesha, and Rajesha against respondents Kiran and Shri Ram General Insurance Company for ₹16,15,000. The settlement was apportioned 60:20:20 among the three petitioners, with Respondent No.2 directed to deposit the amount without delay, liable for agreed interest upon default. Part of petitioner No.1's share was placed in fixed deposit for two years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
12-Mar-2026
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Feb-2026
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
26-Dec-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
06-Nov-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
06-Oct-2025
Appearance Of Party
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
19-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1862/2025
The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between petitioners Renuka, Nagesha, and Rajesha against respondents Kiran and Shri Ram General Insurance Company for ₹16,15,000. The settlement was apportioned 60:20:20 among the three petitioners, with Respondent No.2 directed to deposit the amount without delay, liable for agreed interest upon default. Part of petitioner No.1's share was placed in fixed deposit for two years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts