SUBBAMANI SHETTY vs RAMAKRISHNA — 1545/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080020862025

Filing Number

1545/2025

Filing Date

03-Jun-2025

Registration No

1545/2025

Registration Date

04-Jun-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBBAMANI SHETTY

    Adv. Punyavathi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMAKRISHNA

  2. 2.DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 1545/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between Subbamani Shetty and United India Insurance Company for ₹5,49,550 in an insurance compensation dispute. The court approved the joint memo after confirming the petitioner voluntarily agreed without coercion, and directed the insurer to deposit the full amount immediately, considering the petitioner's medical expenses and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 08-Oct-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 10-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1545/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 1545/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between Subbamani Shetty and United India Insurance Company for ₹5,49,550 in an insurance compensation dispute. The court approved the joint memo after confirming the petitioner voluntarily agreed without coercion, and directed the insurer to deposit the full amount immediately, considering the petitioner's medical expenses and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case