Mr. DHAGLARAM vs Mr. MAHADESH. D.M. — 58/2025
Case under Under Order 26 R/w Order 7 Rules 1 and 2 C.p.c Section UNDER,ORDER,7,RULE,1,AND,2,OF,RW,SEC,26,OF,CPC. Status: Judgements. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
S.C. - Small Cause Suit
CNR: KAMS080020652025
Filing Number
59/2025
Filing Date
08-Jul-2025
Registration No
58/2025
Registration Date
11-Jul-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
859-Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mr. DHAGLARAM
Adv. Dinesh Solanki
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mr. MAHADESH. D.M.
Case History
-
29-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Apr-2026
Judgements
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
26-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
The case (S.C. 58/2025) was adjourned to 26.03.2026 for examination of witnesses. The court recorded the plaintiff's affidavit and admitted various documents as evidence (pan ticket, notarized certificates, authenticated documents, criminal case records, and postal receipts). The defendant failed to appear despite being called, resulting in no objection being raised to the plaintiff's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
07-Feb-2026
Summons
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
23-Jan-2026
Summons
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
13-Dec-2025
Settlement
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
14-Nov-2025
Settlement
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
04-Nov-2025
Notice
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
14-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 58/2025
The case (S.C. 58/2025) was adjourned to 26.03.2026 for examination of witnesses. The court recorded the plaintiff's affidavit and admitted various documents as evidence (pan ticket, notarized certificates, authenticated documents, criminal case records, and postal receipts). The defendant failed to appear despite being called, resulting in no objection being raised to the plaintiff's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts