DEVAMANI vs SOMASHEKHAR MURTHI Advocate - M.MAHESHA — 1024/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080019672024

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

23rd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1063/2024

Filing Date

06-05-2024

Registration No

1024/2024

Registration Date

27-05-2024

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section U/S 166

Petitioner(s)

DEVAMANI

Adv. D. JAGADEESH

BHAGYA

LALITHA

NIRMALA

SHWETHA B.

Respondent(s)

SOMASHEKHAR MURTHI Advocate - M.MAHESHA

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC CHAMARAJANAGARA

NANJUNDANAYAKA

Hearing History

Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

16-02-2026

ORDERS

10-12-2025

NOTICE

17-11-2025

NOTICE

16-10-2025

NOTICE

Interim Orders

17-07-2025
Issue
07-03-2026
Orders

Case Summary Court: Principal Small Causes & Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Mysuru Case No: MVC.1024/2024 Date: March 7, 2026 Outcome: The court rejected the Interlocutory Application (IA-III) filed by the respondent (KSRTC Managing Director) seeking to implead the motorcycle owner and rider as necessary parties to the motor vehicle compensation petition. The court held that the opponents are neither necessary nor proper parties, as the petition can be effectively adjudicated in their absence under the summary proceedings under the Motor Vehicles Act. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court: Principal Small Causes & Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Mysuru Case No: MVC.1024/2024 Date: March 7, 2026 Outcome: The court rejected the Interlocutory Application (IA-III) filed by the respondent (KSRTC Managing Director) seeking to implead the motorcycle owner and rider as necessary parties to the motor vehicle compensation petition. The court held that the opponents are neither necessary nor proper parties, as the petition can be effectively adjudicated in their absence under the summary proceedings under the Motor Vehicles Act. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case