DEVAMANI vs SOMASHEKHAR MURTHI Advocate - M.MAHESHA — 1024/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080019672024
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1063/2024
Filing Date
06-05-2024
Registration No
1024/2024
Registration Date
27-05-2024
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEVAMANI
Adv. D. JAGADEESH
BHAGYA
LALITHA
NIRMALA
SHWETHA B.
Respondent(s)
SOMASHEKHAR MURTHI Advocate - M.MAHESHA
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC CHAMARAJANAGARA
NANJUNDANAYAKA
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
EVIDENCE
ORDERS
NOTICE
NOTICE
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 16-02-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 10-12-2025 | NOTICE | |
| 17-11-2025 | NOTICE | |
| 16-10-2025 | NOTICE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court: Principal Small Causes & Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Mysuru Case No: MVC.1024/2024 Date: March 7, 2026 Outcome: The court rejected the Interlocutory Application (IA-III) filed by the respondent (KSRTC Managing Director) seeking to implead the motorcycle owner and rider as necessary parties to the motor vehicle compensation petition. The court held that the opponents are neither necessary nor proper parties, as the petition can be effectively adjudicated in their absence under the summary proceedings under the Motor Vehicles Act. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: Principal Small Causes & Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Mysuru Case No: MVC.1024/2024 Date: March 7, 2026 Outcome: The court rejected the Interlocutory Application (IA-III) filed by the respondent (KSRTC Managing Director) seeking to implead the motorcycle owner and rider as necessary parties to the motor vehicle compensation petition. The court held that the opponents are neither necessary nor proper parties, as the petition can be effectively adjudicated in their absence under the summary proceedings under the Motor Vehicles Act. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts