SUBRAMANYA J vs MOHNISH D S — 1743/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080019392025

e-Filing Number

17-06-2025

Filing Number

1743/2025

Filing Date

20-Jun-2025

Registration No

1743/2025

Registration Date

20-Jun-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

859-Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBRAMANYA J

    Adv. H R MAHADEVA PRABHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHNISH D S

  2. 2.ACKO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The National Lok Adalath allowed petitioner Subramanya J's petition following a joint settlement memo with respondent Mohnish D S, directing payment of Rs. 3,00,000 within 2 months with 6% interest if delayed. The claim against ACKO General Insurance Company (R1) was dismissed, and the entire settlement amount was ordered released to the petitioner considering his substantial medical expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  4. 13-Dec-2025

    Notice

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  5. 01-Dec-2025

    Notice

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  6. 28-Oct-2025

    Notice

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  7. 25-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1743/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The National Lok Adalath allowed petitioner Subramanya J's petition following a joint settlement memo with respondent Mohnish D S, directing payment of Rs. 3,00,000 within 2 months with 6% interest if delayed. The claim against ACKO General Insurance Company (R1) was dismissed, and the entire settlement amount was ordered released to the petitioner considering his substantial medical expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case