KRISHNAMURTHI vs ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY — 236/2025

Case under Under Order 21 Rule 2 of Cpc Section UNDER,ORDER,21,RULE,2,OF,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KAMS080019222025

Filing Number

195/2025

Filing Date

24-Jun-2025

Registration No

236/2025

Registration Date

01-Sep-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

859-Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Order 21 Rule 2 of Cpc Section UNDER,ORDER,21,RULE,2,OF,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNAMURTHI

    Adv. THIMMAIAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: In case EX 236/2025, the Additional Session Court, Mysuru dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. The court found that despite being given sufficient opportunity, the defendant (D.Hr) failed to take necessary steps and remained absent from proceedings, leading to the dismissal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Notice

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  5. 24-Jan-2026

    Notice

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Notice

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  7. 28-Nov-2025

    Notice

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  8. 24-Oct-2025

    Issue Attachment Warrant

    Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru

  9. 01-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 24-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 236/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In case EX 236/2025, the Additional Session Court, Mysuru dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. The court found that despite being given sufficient opportunity, the defendant (D.Hr) failed to take necessary steps and remained absent from proceedings, leading to the dismissal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case