SHASHIKALA.K.S vs MUHAMMED NASAL.P — 1543/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080018852025

Filing Number

1543/2025

Filing Date

03-Jun-2025

Registration No

1543/2025

Registration Date

04-Jun-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHASHIKALA.K.S

    Adv. Shivaramu AS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUHAMMED NASAL.P

  2. 2.THE MANAGING PARTNER, NAVAS.T, RAZZ MATERIAL

  3. 3.SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 1543/2025 Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Shashikala K.S. and respondents (Muhammed Nasal P, Navas T/Razz Material, and Shriram General Insurance) for ₹1,75,000. The court disposed of the petition based on the joint memo, finding the compromise voluntary and legally enforceable, and directed Respondent No.3 to deposit the full amount immediately, deeming it just given the petitioner's medical expenses and injury nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 05-Nov-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 22-Aug-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 25-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 03-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1543/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 1543/2025 Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Shashikala K.S. and respondents (Muhammed Nasal P, Navas T/Razz Material, and Shriram General Insurance) for ₹1,75,000. The court disposed of the petition based on the joint memo, finding the compromise voluntary and legally enforceable, and directed Respondent No.3 to deposit the full amount immediately, deeming it just given the petitioner's medical expenses and injury nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case