PUTTASWAMY vs SANJAY RAJ.D Advocate - Palaksha — 1122/2022

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 23-Jul-2026

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080018652022

Filing Number

1145/2022

Filing Date

26-Jul-2022

Registration No

1122/2022

Registration Date

26-Jul-2022

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUTTASWAMY

    Adv. M.V.CHANDRA SHEKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY RAJ.D Advocate - Palaksha

  2. 2.EDELVEES GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Case History

  1. 23-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    This document records witness testimony in MVC 1122/2022 before the Principal Judge of the Court of Small Causes and MACT in Mysuru. Dr. Neelangowda, a Professor of Orthopedics, testified on June 16, 2026 regarding the petitioner Puttaswamy's disability assessment following a type 2 open fracture of both bones of the right leg. During cross-examination by the insurance company's counsel, the witness defended his disability assessment against allegations that he failed to follow medical guidelines, omitted muscle strength testing details, and exaggerated disability percentages to support higher compensation claims. The witness maintained that his evaluation was conducted properly and that all suggested allegations were false. No final order or judgment was issued in this excerpt—the document captures only the witness examination phase of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 07-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  10. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  11. 16-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  13. 25-Sep-2025

    IssueView PDF

  14. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  15. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  16. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  17. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  18. 05-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  19. 15-Apr-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  21. 11-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  23. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  24. 13-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  25. 06-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  26. 29-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  27. 22-Oct-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  28. 22-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  29. 13-Sep-2024

    IssueView PDF

  30. 13-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  31. 24-Aug-2024

    Settlement

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  32. 27-Jul-2024

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  33. 05-Jul-2024

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  34. 12-Jun-2024

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  35. 21-May-2024

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  36. 03-Apr-2024

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  37. 14-Mar-2024

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  38. 01-Feb-2024

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  39. 19-Jan-2024

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  40. 21-Dec-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  41. 23-Nov-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  42. 02-Nov-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  43. 03-Oct-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  44. 07-Sep-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  45. 10-Aug-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  46. 26-Jul-2023

    Summons

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  47. 10-Jul-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  48. 08-Jun-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  49. 06-May-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  50. 05-Apr-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  51. 01-Apr-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  52. 01-Mar-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  53. 10-Feb-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  54. 03-Feb-2023

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  55. 31-Dec-2022

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  56. 29-Nov-2022

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  57. 25-Oct-2022

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  58. 06-Oct-2022

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  59. 16-Sep-2022

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  60. 27-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 26-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1122/2022

casestatus.in Summary

This document records witness testimony in MVC 1122/2022 before the Principal Judge of the Court of Small Causes and MACT in Mysuru. Dr. Neelangowda, a Professor of Orthopedics, testified on June 16, 2026 regarding the petitioner Puttaswamy's disability assessment following a type 2 open fracture of both bones of the right leg. During cross-examination by the insurance company's counsel, the witness defended his disability assessment against allegations that he failed to follow medical guidelines, omitted muscle strength testing details, and exaggerated disability percentages to support higher compensation claims. The witness maintained that his evaluation was conducted properly and that all suggested allegations were false. No final order or judgment was issued in this excerpt—the document captures only the witness examination phase of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case