NAWAZ AHAMED vs SAROJAMMA — 1460/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080016522025
Filing Number
1460/2025
Filing Date
24-May-2025
Registration No
1460/2025
Registration Date
27-May-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAWAZ AHAMED
Adv. K.V.YOGESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAROJAMMA
-
2.MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
In Case 1460/2025, the Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Nawaz Ahamed and respondent Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited for ₹10,000. The court approved the voluntary compromise, finding it just and necessary to release the entire amount to the petitioner considering his significant medical expenses and injury severity, with the insurance company directed to deposit the amount without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
26-Feb-2026
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
29-Dec-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
11-Nov-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
19-Sep-2025
Appearance Of Party
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
12-Aug-2025
Appearance Of Party
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
11-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1460/2025
In Case 1460/2025, the Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Nawaz Ahamed and respondent Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited for ₹10,000. The court approved the voluntary compromise, finding it just and necessary to release the entire amount to the petitioner considering his significant medical expenses and injury severity, with the insurance company directed to deposit the amount without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts