NAGAMMA vs GOWTHAM.P.N — 1457/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080016492025

Filing Number

1457/2025

Filing Date

24-May-2025

Registration No

1457/2025

Registration Date

27-May-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAGAMMA

    Adv. K.V.YOGESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOWTHAM.P.N

  2. 2.THE MANAGER, THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between Nagamma and Oriental Insurance Company Limited for ₹11,00,000, disposing of the petition based on the joint memo filed by both parties. The court directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount without unreasonable delay, finding the petitioner competent to receive the entire compensation given her substantial medical expenses and injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Issue

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 03-Oct-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  9. 12-Aug-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  10. 11-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 24-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1457/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between Nagamma and Oriental Insurance Company Limited for ₹11,00,000, disposing of the petition based on the joint memo filed by both parties. The court directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount without unreasonable delay, finding the petitioner competent to receive the entire compensation given her substantial medical expenses and injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case