SACHIN KUMAR.C.J vs DEVAIAH.P.U — 998/2022
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Status: Call On. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080016482022
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
990/2022
Filing Date
11-07-2022
Registration No
998/2022
Registration Date
11-07-2022
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SACHIN KUMAR.C.J
Adv. N.BASAVARAJ
Respondent(s)
DEVAIAH.P.U
THE MANAGER, IFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Call On
Call On
Call On
Call On
Call On
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Call On | |
| 07-03-2026 | Call On | |
| 16-02-2026 | Call On | |
| 12-01-2026 | Call On | |
| 17-12-2025 | Call On |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a cross-examination transcript from MVC No. 998/2022 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), Mysuru, recorded on 18.11.2025. Witness Sindhu (PW3), the brother of the accident victim (PW1), testified regarding medical treatment following a head injury accident. The respondent's counsel challenged the witness's credibility, highlighting discrepancies between his testimony and hospital records—including conflicting statements about hospitalization duration, treating doctors, and the timing of when injuries were discovered as serious. The witness denied allegations of procuring false medical certificates and denied withholding records, maintaining that PW1 developed genuine complications including epileptic attacks and motor control issues post-injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a cross-examination transcript from MVC No. 998/2022 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), Mysuru, recorded on 18.11.2025. Witness Sindhu (PW3), the brother of the accident victim (PW1), testified regarding medical treatment following a head injury accident. The respondent's counsel challenged the witness's credibility, highlighting discrepancies between his testimony and hospital records—including conflicting statements about hospitalization duration, treating doctors, and the timing of when injuries were discovered as serious. The witness denied allegations of procuring false medical certificates and denied withholding records, maintaining that PW1 developed genuine complications including epileptic attacks and motor control issues post-injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts