RAGHU.B.K vs THE MANAGER, M/S DILIP BUILDCON LTD — 933/2023
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080016002023
Filing Number
938/2023
Filing Date
08-Jun-2023
Registration No
933/2023
Registration Date
08-Jun-2023
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
859-Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAGHU.B.K
Adv. H.R.MAHADEVA PRABHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE MANAGER, M/S DILIP BUILDCON LTD
-
2.THE MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE COM LTD
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Summons
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
18-May-2026
Summons
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
23-Apr-2026
Summons
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
17-Mar-2026
Summons
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
14-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
17-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
Summary of MVC 933/2023 - RAGHU.B.K v. Dilip Buildcon Ltd and National Insurance Co Ltd The petition concerns a motor vehicle accident on 22.04.2023 involving three vehicles, where petitioner Raghu's car was hit by a concrete mixer vehicle. The court examined witness testimony regarding vehicle damages and insurance coverage. Petitioner claimed over Rs. 2,30,000 in repair costs with insurance estimate of Rs. 1,25,000, plus approximately Rs. 30,000 in medical expenses for minor injuries. The petition was dismissed as petitioner failed to make the three-wheeler vehicle driver a party to the case, which was deemed necessary for proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
04-Nov-2025
Call On
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
16-Oct-2025
Objections
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
03-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
12-Aug-2025
Objections
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
10-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
11-Feb-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
11-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
03-Dec-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
04-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
18-Sep-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
08-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
12-Jun-2024
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
16-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
20-Feb-2024
IssueView PDF
-
20-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
27-Nov-2023
Notice
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
31-Oct-2023
Notice
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
14-Sep-2023
Notice
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
10-Aug-2023
Notice
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
13-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 933/2023
Summary of MVC 933/2023 - RAGHU.B.K v. Dilip Buildcon Ltd and National Insurance Co Ltd The petition concerns a motor vehicle accident on 22.04.2023 involving three vehicles, where petitioner Raghu's car was hit by a concrete mixer vehicle. The court examined witness testimony regarding vehicle damages and insurance coverage. Petitioner claimed over Rs. 2,30,000 in repair costs with insurance estimate of Rs. 1,25,000, plus approximately Rs. 30,000 in medical expenses for minor injuries. The petition was dismissed as petitioner failed to make the three-wheeler vehicle driver a party to the case, which was deemed necessary for proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts