LINGAPPA vs ULLASH.P Advocate - G.C.MOHAN KUMAR — 904/2023
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080015552023
Filing Number
808/2023
Filing Date
07-Jun-2023
Registration No
904/2023
Registration Date
07-Jun-2023
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LINGAPPA
Adv. M..D.GIRISH
Respondent(s)
-
1.ULLASH.P Advocate - G.C.MOHAN KUMAR
-
2.SBI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
04-May-2026
DepositionView PDF
This is a witness deposition (PW.2) in MVC 904/2023, not a final court order. Dr. Lakshith Biddappa, an oral and maxillofacial surgeon, testified on 04.05.2026 regarding his assessment of the petitioner's injuries from an accident. The witness assessed 8% disability based on loss of sensation in the left chin, lower limb, and lower gingiva region using the Kessler's formula. During cross-examination by respondent's counsel, the witness defended his assessment against allegations that he exaggerated disability claims and violated Central Government guidelines, denying that his disability assessment was biased toward supporting higher compensation for the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
30-Jan-2026
Summons
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
27-May-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
17-Apr-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
20-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
10-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
06-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
14-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
01-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
31-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
08-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
16-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
18-Jun-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
18-Jun-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
14-May-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
03-Apr-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
18-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
09-Feb-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
18-Jan-2024
IssueView PDF
-
18-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Dec-2023
Issues
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
08-Dec-2023
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Nov-2023
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
13-Oct-2023
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
14-Sep-2023
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
22-Aug-2023
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Jul-2023
Appearance Of Party
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 904/2023
This is a witness deposition (PW.2) in MVC 904/2023, not a final court order. Dr. Lakshith Biddappa, an oral and maxillofacial surgeon, testified on 04.05.2026 regarding his assessment of the petitioner's injuries from an accident. The witness assessed 8% disability based on loss of sensation in the left chin, lower limb, and lower gingiva region using the Kessler's formula. During cross-examination by respondent's counsel, the witness defended his assessment against allegations that he exaggerated disability claims and violated Central Government guidelines, denying that his disability assessment was biased toward supporting higher compensation for the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts