MAHADEVASWAMY vs H.M.SHIVAPRASAD — 1303/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080015492025
Filing Number
1303/2025
Filing Date
02-May-2025
Registration No
1303/2025
Registration Date
02-May-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHADEVASWAMY
Adv. Shivaramu AS
Respondent(s)
-
1.H.M.SHIVAPRASAD
-
2.SHIVAKUMAR
-
3.CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
Case 1303/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between petitioner Mahadevaswamy and respondents H.M. Shivaprasad, Shivakumar, and Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited for ₹8,70,000. The court found the parties competent and the settlement terms legally enforceable, dismissing the petition against respondents 1 and 2, while directing respondent 3 (the insurance company) to deposit the full compensation amount to the petitioner without delay, considering his medical expenses and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
13-Mar-2026
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Feb-2026
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
08-Jan-2026
Issue
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
03-Jul-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1303/2025
Case 1303/2025 Summary: The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between petitioner Mahadevaswamy and respondents H.M. Shivaprasad, Shivakumar, and Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited for ₹8,70,000. The court found the parties competent and the settlement terms legally enforceable, dismissing the petition against respondents 1 and 2, while directing respondent 3 (the insurance company) to deposit the full compensation amount to the petitioner without delay, considering his medical expenses and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts