PRAKASH vs UMAR FAROOQ — 828/2022
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080013682022
Filing Number
837/2022
Filing Date
07-06-2022
Registration No
828/2022
Registration Date
07-06-2022
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAKASH
Adv. MAHADEVA DESHAK
MEENAKSHI
JAYALAKSHMI
CHANNAIAH C.J.
Respondent(s)
UMAR FAROOQ
K. IBRAHIM
THE MANAGER, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Disposed
NOTICE
NOTICE
NOTICE
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-02-2026 | NOTICE |
| 29-12-2025 | NOTICE |
| 13-11-2025 | NOTICE |
| 22-09-2025 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between the petitioners and respondents for ₹5,75,000 in this insurance compensation case. The court approved the full release of the settlement amount to the petitioner, considering the substantial medical expenses incurred and the nature of injuries suffered, and directed Respondent No.3 (IFFCO Tokio General Insurance) to deposit the amount without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between the petitioners and respondents for ₹5,75,000 in this insurance compensation case. The court approved the full release of the settlement amount to the petitioner, considering the substantial medical expenses incurred and the nature of injuries suffered, and directed Respondent No.3 (IFFCO Tokio General Insurance) to deposit the amount without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts