Y R SHARADA vs P Y VINITHA — 1160/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080013522025
e-Filing Number
18-04-2025
Filing Number
1160/2025
Filing Date
23-Apr-2025
Registration No
1160/2025
Registration Date
23-Apr-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Y R SHARADA
Adv. H R MAHADEVA PRABHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.P Y VINITHA
-
2.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 1160/2025 Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between petitioner Y R Sharada and respondent United India Insurance Company Limited for ₹10,03,485. The court ordered the insurance company to deposit the full settlement amount without unreasonable delay, finding the compromise voluntary, legally enforceable, and justified given the petitioner's substantial medical expenses and injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Feb-2026
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
13-Dec-2025
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Dec-2025
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
25-Oct-2025
IssueView PDF
-
25-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
08-Sep-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
09-Jul-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1160/2025
Case 1160/2025 Summary The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between petitioner Y R Sharada and respondent United India Insurance Company Limited for ₹10,03,485. The court ordered the insurance company to deposit the full settlement amount without unreasonable delay, finding the compromise voluntary, legally enforceable, and justified given the petitioner's substantial medical expenses and injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts