CHIDANAND H.B. @ ANAND HIS IN UNCONCIOUS REP. BY HIS SISTER H.B.SHILPA vs THE MANAGER, K.S.R.T.C Advocate - R. KIRAN — 808/2023
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Status: OBJECTIONS. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080013342023
Next Hearing
25th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
798/2023
Filing Date
09-05-2023
Registration No
808/2023
Registration Date
09-05-2023
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHIDANAND H.B. @ ANAND HIS IN UNCONCIOUS REP. BY HIS SISTER H.B.SHILPA
Adv. H.R.MAHADEVA PRABHU
Respondent(s)
THE MANAGER, K.S.R.T.C Advocate - R. KIRAN
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
OBJECTIONS
ORDERS
HEARING
ARGUMENTS
OBJECTIONS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 17-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 04-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 24-12-2025 | OBJECTIONS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: MVC.808/2023 | Court: Principal Small Causes and Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Mysuru | Date: 17 February 2026 Outcome: The court allowed KSRTC's application to amend its objections to the main petition under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC. The respondent is permitted to add pleas regarding lack of territorial jurisdiction and non-joinder of necessary parties, with amendments to be filed within 14 days. The petitioner's objections were rejected as they raised factual issues improper for consideration at the amendment stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: MVC.808/2023 | Court: Principal Small Causes and Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Mysuru | Date: 17 February 2026 Outcome: The court allowed KSRTC's application to amend its objections to the main petition under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC. The respondent is permitted to add pleas regarding lack of territorial jurisdiction and non-joinder of necessary parties, with amendments to be filed within 14 days. The petitioner's objections were rejected as they raised factual issues improper for consideration at the amendment stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts