CHIDANAND H.B. @ ANAND HIS IN UNCONCIOUS REP. BY HIS SISTER H.B.SHILPA vs THE MANAGER, K.S.R.T.C Advocate - R. KIRAN — 808/2023
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Status: Objections. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080013342023
Filing Number
798/2023
Filing Date
09-May-2023
Registration No
808/2023
Registration Date
09-May-2023
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHIDANAND H.B. @ ANAND HIS IN UNCONCIOUS REP. BY HIS SISTER H.B.SHILPA
Adv. H.R.MAHADEVA PRABHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE MANAGER, K.S.R.T.C Advocate - R. KIRAN
Case History
-
25-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-Apr-2026
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
17-Feb-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary Case: MVC.808/2023 | Court: Principal Small Causes and Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Mysuru | Date: 17 February 2026 Outcome: The court allowed KSRTC's application to amend its objections to the main petition under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC. The respondent is permitted to add pleas regarding lack of territorial jurisdiction and non-joinder of necessary parties, with amendments to be filed within 14 days. The petitioner's objections were rejected as they raised factual issues improper for consideration at the amendment stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Feb-2026
Arguments
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
24-Dec-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
24-Nov-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
16-Oct-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
12-Aug-2025
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
17-Jul-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
12-Jun-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-May-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
07-May-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
21-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
19-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
22-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
17-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
17-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
21-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Dec-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
04-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
30-Oct-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
30-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
01-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
30-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
06-Aug-2024
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
09-Jul-2024
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
10-Jun-2024
Call On
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Apr-2024
Summons
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
01-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Mar-2024
IssueView PDF
-
07-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
15-Feb-2024
Issues
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
29-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
05-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
13-Dec-2023
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
24-Nov-2023
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
03-Nov-2023
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
13-Oct-2023
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
15-Sep-2023
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
23-Aug-2023
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
26-Jul-2023
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
10-Jul-2023
Appearance Of Party
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
08-Jul-2023
Call On
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
11-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 808/2023
Case Summary Case: MVC.808/2023 | Court: Principal Small Causes and Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Mysuru | Date: 17 February 2026 Outcome: The court allowed KSRTC's application to amend its objections to the main petition under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC. The respondent is permitted to add pleas regarding lack of territorial jurisdiction and non-joinder of necessary parties, with amendments to be filed within 14 days. The petitioner's objections were rejected as they raised factual issues improper for consideration at the amendment stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts