SMT KALAMMA vs DIVISIONAL MANAGER, KSRTC — 149/2025

Case under Under Order 21 Rule 2 of Cpc. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KAMS080012942025

Filing Number

145/2025

Filing Date

24-Apr-2025

Registration No

149/2025

Registration Date

02-May-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Order 21 Rule 2 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT KALAMMA

    Adv. M.B.GANESHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIVISIONAL MANAGER, KSRTC

  2. 2.SRI SIDDASHETTY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Court of SC & MACT, Mysuru dismissed the petition as not pressed, accepting the submission of the Defendant's counsel that since an appeal is pending and the High Court of Karnataka has stayed the operation and execution of the award, the petition should be closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Issue Attachment Warrant

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 21-Nov-2025

    Issue Attachment Warrant

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 13-Oct-2025

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 12-Aug-2025

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  9. 28-Jun-2025

    Appearance Of Party

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  10. 03-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 24-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 149/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of SC & MACT, Mysuru dismissed the petition as not pressed, accepting the submission of the Defendant's counsel that since an appeal is pending and the High Court of Karnataka has stayed the operation and execution of the award, the petition should be closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case