MAHESH M vs MAHESH G — 976/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080011892025
e-Filing Number
04-04-2025
Filing Number
976/2025
Filing Date
05-Apr-2025
Registration No
976/2025
Registration Date
05-Apr-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESH M
Adv. H R MAHADEVA PRABHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHESH G
-
2.ACKO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between petitioner Mahesh M and respondent ACKO General Insurance Company for ₹2,60,000, disposing of the petition. The court found the compromise voluntary and legally enforceable, and directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount to the petitioner without unreasonable delay, considering his medical expenses and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
13-Mar-2026
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Feb-2026
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
13-Dec-2025
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Nov-2025
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
14-Oct-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
13-Sep-2025
Call On
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Aug-2025
Call On
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
23-Jun-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
09-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 976/2025
The Lok Adalath accepted a settlement agreement between petitioner Mahesh M and respondent ACKO General Insurance Company for ₹2,60,000, disposing of the petition. The court found the compromise voluntary and legally enforceable, and directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount to the petitioner without unreasonable delay, considering his medical expenses and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts