H M CHIRATH vs NANDINI H P — 840/2025
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080011292025
Filing Number
840/2025
Filing Date
24-Mar-2025
Registration No
840/2025
Registration Date
25-Mar-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.H M CHIRATH
Adv. K A Poovanna
Respondent(s)
-
1.NANDINI H P
-
2.THE MANAGER, UNITED GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
Case 840/2025 was settled through Lok Adalath conciliation on 14.03.2026, with petitioner H M Chirath and respondents agreeing to a compromise of ₹17,11,139. The court accepted the joint memo, finding the settlement legally enforceable and the petitioner competent to receive the full amount, and directed United General Insurance Company Limited to deposit the settlement amount into the petitioner's bank account without delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Mar-2026
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
23-Jan-2026
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
08-Dec-2025
Appearance Of Party
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
10-Oct-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
06-Aug-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
18-Jun-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
05-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 840/2025
Case 840/2025 was settled through Lok Adalath conciliation on 14.03.2026, with petitioner H M Chirath and respondents agreeing to a compromise of ₹17,11,139. The court accepted the joint memo, finding the settlement legally enforceable and the petitioner competent to receive the full amount, and directed United General Insurance Company Limited to deposit the settlement amount into the petitioner's bank account without delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts