MAHADEVASWAMY B S vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC — 795/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080010962025
Filing Number
795/2025
Filing Date
18-Mar-2025
Registration No
795/2025
Registration Date
18-Mar-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHADEVASWAMY B S
Adv. Ravi Kumar G
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC
-
2.ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Lok Adalath accepted a joint settlement memo between petitioner Mahadevaswamy B S and respondents KSRTC and Oriental Insurance Company Limited for ₹3,10,000. The court found the parties competent and the settlement terms legally enforceable. Oriental Insurance Company (Respondent No. 2) was directed to deposit the full amount to the petitioner without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
13-Mar-2026
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Feb-2026
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
03-Dec-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
04-Oct-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
29-Aug-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
22-Jul-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
09-Jun-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
29-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 795/2025
The Lok Adalath accepted a joint settlement memo between petitioner Mahadevaswamy B S and respondents KSRTC and Oriental Insurance Company Limited for ₹3,10,000. The court found the parties competent and the settlement terms legally enforceable. Oriental Insurance Company (Respondent No. 2) was directed to deposit the full amount to the petitioner without unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts