KOUSHIK vs GOWRAMMA — 830/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080010852025
e-Filing Number
21-03-2025
Filing Number
830/2025
Filing Date
24-Mar-2025
Registration No
830/2025
Registration Date
24-Mar-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KOUSHIK
Adv. H R MAHADEVA PRABHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOWRAMMA
-
2.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
In Case 830/2025, the Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Koushik and respondents Gowramma and United India Insurance Company for ₹5,47,897. The court approved the voluntary compromise after confirming the petitioner's consent without coercion and directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount without delay, finding it just and necessary to release the entire compensation given the petitioner's substantial medical expenses and injury nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
12-Dec-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
06-Nov-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
17-Sep-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
17-Jul-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
05-Jun-2025
Appearance Of Party
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 830/2025
In Case 830/2025, the Lok Adalath accepted a settlement between petitioner Koushik and respondents Gowramma and United India Insurance Company for ₹5,47,897. The court approved the voluntary compromise after confirming the petitioner's consent without coercion and directed the insurance company to deposit the full amount without delay, finding it just and necessary to release the entire compensation given the petitioner's substantial medical expenses and injury nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts