NAGARAJU vs ANKEGOWDA Advocate - D.B.RAJASHEKARAMURTHY — 429/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 30-Jun-2026

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080008282024

Filing Number

452/2024

Filing Date

20-Feb-2024

Registration No

429/2024

Registration Date

21-Feb-2024

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAGARAJU

    Adv. RAGHU T.J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANKEGOWDA Advocate - D.B.RAJASHEKARAMURTHY

  2. 2.THE MANAGER, ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

    Adv. B.G. KUMAR

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 13-Dec-2025

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  9. 20-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: MVC 429/2024 Dr. Vijay Kumar N. (PW.2) testified on 14.10.2025 in this motor vehicle compensation case before the Principal Judge, Court of Small Causes and MACT, Mysuru. The witness affirmed his affidavit as true and submitted medical evidence including case sheets, X-ray films, and CT-scan films as exhibits. Since both respondents (Advocate D.B. Rajashekaramurthy and Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd.) failed to file objections and had no representation, cross-examination was marked as nil, allowing the case to proceed based on the petitioner's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 14-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  12. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  13. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  14. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  15. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  16. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  17. 09-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  18. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  19. 21-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  21. 20-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  23. 09-Jan-2025

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  24. 02-Dec-2024

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  25. 14-Oct-2024

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  26. 30-Aug-2024

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  27. 26-Jul-2024

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  28. 29-Jun-2024

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  29. 23-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 20-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 429/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MVC 429/2024 Dr. Vijay Kumar N. (PW.2) testified on 14.10.2025 in this motor vehicle compensation case before the Principal Judge, Court of Small Causes and MACT, Mysuru. The witness affirmed his affidavit as true and submitted medical evidence including case sheets, X-ray films, and CT-scan films as exhibits. Since both respondents (Advocate D.B. Rajashekaramurthy and Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd.) failed to file objections and had no representation, cross-examination was marked as nil, allowing the case to proceed based on the petitioner's evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case