KUMAR K vs SANTHOSNI S — 429/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080006662025
e-Filing Number
07-02-2025
Filing Number
429/2025
Filing Date
07-Feb-2025
Registration No
429/2025
Registration Date
07-Feb-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
859-Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KUMAR K
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANTHOSNI S
-
2.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
Case Summary - MVC 429/2025 The Court of Small Causes, Mysuru allowed petitioner Kumar K's claim through a settlement with respondent Santhosni S (R2) for Rs. 3,10,000, payable within 2 months with 6% per annum interest if delayed. The claim against Reliance General Insurance Company Limited (R1) was dismissed. The entire settlement amount was ordered released to the petitioner in recognition of medical expenses already incurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
07-Jan-2026
Notice
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
26-Dec-2025
Notice
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
24-Nov-2025
Notice
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
12-Sep-2025
Notice
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
17-May-2025
Notice
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
21-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 429/2025
Case Summary - MVC 429/2025 The Court of Small Causes, Mysuru allowed petitioner Kumar K's claim through a settlement with respondent Santhosni S (R2) for Rs. 3,10,000, payable within 2 months with 6% per annum interest if delayed. The claim against Reliance General Insurance Company Limited (R1) was dismissed. The entire settlement amount was ordered released to the petitioner in recognition of medical expenses already incurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts