DIVYA SAMAJA NIRMANA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY vs SMT. ARUNA — 77/2025

Case under Under Order 21 Rule 2 of Cpc. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KAMS080005532025

Filing Number

82/2025

Filing Date

12-Feb-2025

Registration No

77/2025

Registration Date

12-Feb-2025

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Order 21 Rule 2 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIVYA SAMAJA NIRMANA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY

    Adv. Gnanesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. ARUNA

  2. 2.NAGESH B.N

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Court of SC & MACT, Mysuru dismissed the execution petition (Ex 77/2025) for non-prosecution under Order 17 Rule 2 & 3 of CPC, finding that the Defendant/Respondent (DHr) failed to take necessary steps for warrant execution despite multiple opportunities and merely paid PF without demonstrating due diligence. The dismissal was ordered due to the DHr's absence at the hearing and abandonment of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 06-Dec-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 25-Sep-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 28-Jun-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 29-Mar-2025

    Notice

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  9. 13-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 77/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of SC & MACT, Mysuru dismissed the execution petition (Ex 77/2025) for non-prosecution under Order 17 Rule 2 & 3 of CPC, finding that the Defendant/Respondent (DHr) failed to take necessary steps for warrant execution despite multiple opportunities and merely paid PF without demonstrating due diligence. The dismissal was ordered due to the DHr's absence at the hearing and abandonment of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case