SRI SHIVANNA vs CHIKKOOSEGOWDA SINCE DEAD BY LRS1. — 6/2018

Case under Under Order 20 Rule 18 R/w Sec.54 of C.p.c. Section 1. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr

CNR: KAMS080004932018

HEARING

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

6/2018

Filing Date

01-03-2018

Registration No

6/2018

Registration Date

02-03-2018

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

859-JUDGE ADDL SMALL CAUSES COURT MYSURU

Acts & Sections

Under Order 20 Rule 18 R/W Sec.54 of C.P.C. Section 1

Petitioner(s)

SRI SHIVANNA

Adv. S.T.SOMA SHEKHARA

NAGARAJU

KUMAR

Respondent(s)

CHIKKOOSEGOWDA SINCE DEAD BY LRS1.

CHIKKATHAYAMMA 1.

MAHADEVU 1.

BEERAPPA

MARIMAYIGOWDA

CHIKKABEERAMMA

SMT. MOOGAMMA

SMT. SAKAMMA

MAYANNA

Adv. PALAKSHA

BEERAPPA

Adv. PALAKSHA

SMT. JAVANAMMA, DEAD BY LRS.(Legal Heir)

SMT. CHIKKATHAYAMMA

SMT. MAKAMMA

SMT. PUTTATHAYAMMA

SMT. MALLINGAMMA

SMT. THAYAMMA

SMT. JAYAMMA

SMT. CHIKKABEERAMMA

Hearing History

Judge: 859-JUDGE ADDL SMALL CAUSES COURT MYSURU

28-03-2026

HEARING

07-03-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

HEARING

13-02-2026

HEARING

31-01-2026

OBJECTIONS

Interim Orders

16-06-2020
Orders

Summary: The court allowed Interim Application No. 3 filed by respondents No. 6 and 7 to set aside the ex parte order passed against them in a final decree proceeding (FDP.6/2018) related to property dispute. The court found that while the respondents' claim of non-service of summons was questionable, in the interest of natural justice they deserved an opportunity to contest the proceedings. The application was granted on payment of costs of Rs. 500/-. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed Interim Application No. 3 filed by respondents No. 6 and 7 to set aside the ex parte order passed against them in a final decree proceeding (FDP.6/2018) related to property dispute. The court found that while the respondents' claim of non-service of summons was questionable, in the interest of natural justice they deserved an opportunity to contest the proceedings. The application was granted on payment of costs of Rs. 500/-. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case