SAROJA vs SHASHIKUMAR Y.S. Advocate - KIRAN K. — 248/2022

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080003842022

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

221/2022

Filing Date

07-02-2022

Registration No

248/2022

Registration Date

07-02-2022

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1989 Section U/S 166

Petitioner(s)

SAROJA

Adv. B.R.CHANDRAMOULI

Respondent(s)

SHASHIKUMAR Y.S. Advocate - KIRAN K.

HAALEGOWDA

Adv. HARISHKUMAR J

Hearing History

Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

07-02-2026

EVIDENCE

23-01-2026

EVIDENCE

20-12-2025

EVIDENCE

02-12-2025

OBJECTIONS

Interim Orders

23-02-2023
Orders
20-04-2023
Issue
12-06-2023
Deposition
25-07-2023
Deposition
15-11-2023
Deposition
09-02-2024
Deposition
21-02-2024
Deposition
13-03-2024
Deposition
26-03-2024
Issue
17-02-2025
Deposition
18-03-2025
Deposition
16-04-2025
Deposition
21-11-2025
Deposition
23-01-2026
Deposition
07-03-2026
Deposition

Case Status Summary: In MVC No. 248/2022, the Court of Small Causes & MACT, Mysuru heard the cross-examination of witness PW1 (Halegowda) on 07.03.2026 regarding ownership of motorcycle KA-09-EJ-0279. The witness testified that he sold the vehicle to Sri. Madhusudan. R in 2009, though the B register extract showed it in his name in 2024, and disputed the accuracy of exhibit P17. The case has been adjourned/deferred for continued cross-examination at the request of the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Status Summary: In MVC No. 248/2022, the Court of Small Causes & MACT, Mysuru heard the cross-examination of witness PW1 (Halegowda) on 07.03.2026 regarding ownership of motorcycle KA-09-EJ-0279. The witness testified that he sold the vehicle to Sri. Madhusudan. R in 2009, though the B register extract showed it in his name in 2024, and disputed the accuracy of exhibit P17. The case has been adjourned/deferred for continued cross-examination at the request of the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case