AMAL BHASKAR vs MAHESHA Advocate - A.G.SUDHEER — 227/2023
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080003362023
Filing Number
182/2023
Filing Date
03-02-2023
Registration No
227/2023
Registration Date
03-02-2023
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMAL BHASKAR
Adv. B.SOMANAYAKA
Respondent(s)
MAHESHA Advocate - A.G.SUDHEER
S. RAJESWARI
Adv. A.G.SUDHEER
THE MANAGER, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. K.L. SUGANDHI
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Disposed
A.D.R.
SETTLEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 10-03-2026 | SETTLEMENT |
| 13-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 20-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Lok Adalath accepted a joint settlement memo between petitioner Amal Bhaskar and respondents (advocates and IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd.) for ₹8,50,000. The court found the parties competent and terms legally enforceable, dismissing the petition against respondents 1 and 2, while directing respondent 3 (the insurance company) to deposit the full amount to the petitioner without unreasonable delay, considering the medical expenses and injuries involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Lok Adalath accepted a joint settlement memo between petitioner Amal Bhaskar and respondents (advocates and IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd.) for ₹8,50,000. The court found the parties competent and terms legally enforceable, dismissing the petition against respondents 1 and 2, while directing respondent 3 (the insurance company) to deposit the full amount to the petitioner without unreasonable delay, considering the medical expenses and injuries involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts