KALASAMMA vs ASHOK B K — 177/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080002902025
e-Filing Number
15-01-2025
Filing Number
177/2025
Filing Date
16-Jan-2025
Registration No
177/2025
Registration Date
16-Jan-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
859-Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KALASAMMA
Adv. MAHESHA S
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHOK B K
-
2.THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
Summary In case MVC 177/2025 before the National Lok Adalath at Mysuru Court of Small Causes, the petitioner and respondent No. 2 reached a lawful settlement, and the court approved the compromise. Respondent No. 2 is ordered to pay Rs. 4,90,000 to the petitioner within 3 months, with 6% annual interest if payment is delayed, and the claim against Respondent No. 1 is dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
07-Mar-2026
A.D.R.
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
24-Jan-2026
A.D.R.
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
03-Dec-2025
Notice
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
08-Oct-2025
Notice
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
16-Aug-2025
Notice
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
02-May-2025
Notice
Judge Addl Small Causes Court Mysuru
-
20-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 177/2025
Summary In case MVC 177/2025 before the National Lok Adalath at Mysuru Court of Small Causes, the petitioner and respondent No. 2 reached a lawful settlement, and the court approved the compromise. Respondent No. 2 is ordered to pay Rs. 4,90,000 to the petitioner within 3 months, with 6% annual interest if payment is delayed, and the claim against Respondent No. 1 is dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts