RAJESHA D.H. vs SHASHIKUMAR Advocate - M.S.RAJESH — 129/2023

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080002082023

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

109/2023

Filing Date

17-01-2023

Registration No

129/2023

Registration Date

17-01-2023

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166

Petitioner(s)

RAJESHA D.H.

Adv. ARJUN GOWDA.T.M

Respondent(s)

SHASHIKUMAR Advocate - M.S.RAJESH

THE MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

Adv. K.L. SUGANDHI

Hearing History

Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES

06-05-2026

ARGUMENTS

25-04-2026

ARGUMENTS

04-04-2026

ARGUMENTS

14-03-2026

A.D.R.

10-03-2026

A.D.R.

Interim Orders

02-08-2023
Issue
23-02-2024
Deposition
30-08-2024
Deposition
25-10-2025
Deposition
19-11-2025
Deposition

This document is a cross-examination transcript from a Motor Vehicles Compensation (MVC) case, not a court order with a final outcome. It records witness Rajesha H.D.'s testimony on 19.11.2025 regarding a motorcycle accident on 27.08.2021. The witness refutes the opposing counsel's suggestions, maintaining that Respondent No.1's vehicle caused the accident, that she possessed valid documentation and insurance, underwent genuine hospitalization, and suffered disability. No judgment or order has been issued in this case yet—the proceeding is still in the evidentiary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a cross-examination transcript from a Motor Vehicles Compensation (MVC) case, not a court order with a final outcome. It records witness Rajesha H.D.'s testimony on 19.11.2025 regarding a motorcycle accident on 27.08.2021. The witness refutes the opposing counsel's suggestions, maintaining that Respondent No.1's vehicle caused the accident, that she possessed valid documentation and insurance, underwent genuine hospitalization, and suffered disability. No judgment or order has been issued in this case yet—the proceeding is still in the evidentiary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case