NATARAJU.H.D vs SHASHIKUMAR Advocate - M.S.RAJESH — 128/2023

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080002062023

Filing Number

108/2023

Filing Date

17-Jan-2023

Registration No

128/2023

Registration Date

17-Jan-2023

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-Judge Court Of Small Causes

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NATARAJU.H.D

    Adv. ARJUN GOWDA.T.M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHASHIKUMAR Advocate - M.S.RAJESH

  2. 2.THE MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Arguments

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  3. 25-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Appearance Of Party

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  10. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: MVC No. 128/2023 This is a motor vehicle compensation case where petitioner Nataraju H.D. was cross-examined on 19.11.2025 regarding a motorcycle accident from 27.08.2021. The petitioner, who sustained right leg injuries, testified that he was riding as a passenger when the accident occurred near K.R. Nagar. He denied respondent counsel's suggestions that the rider lacked valid licensing, the vehicle was uninsured, or that rider negligence (due to rain) caused the accident. Petitioner also refuted allegations that medical bills were fabricated, that he suffered no disability, or that he currently earns more than pre-accident income. The cross-examination covered liability against Cholamandalam General Insurance Co. Ltd. and allegations of false FIS filing and forged documents. No re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  13. 25-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  15. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  16. 24-Jul-2025

    Appearance Of Party

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  17. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  18. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  19. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  20. 07-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  21. 15-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  22. 19-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  23. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  24. 30-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  25. 27-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  26. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  27. 30-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  28. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  29. 30-Aug-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  30. 30-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  31. 02-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  32. 13-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  33. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  34. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  35. 15-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  36. 04-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  37. 18-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  38. 23-Feb-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  39. 23-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  40. 22-Feb-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  41. 22-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  42. 06-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  43. 12-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  44. 20-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  45. 01-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  46. 10-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  47. 20-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  48. 12-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  49. 26-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  50. 07-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  51. 23-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  52. 08-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  53. 24-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  54. 10-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  55. 21-Jun-2023

    IssueView PDF

  56. 21-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  57. 05-Jun-2023

    Issues

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  58. 06-Apr-2023

    Objections

    Judge Court Of Small Causes

  59. 18-Jan-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 17-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 128/2023

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: MVC No. 128/2023 This is a motor vehicle compensation case where petitioner Nataraju H.D. was cross-examined on 19.11.2025 regarding a motorcycle accident from 27.08.2021. The petitioner, who sustained right leg injuries, testified that he was riding as a passenger when the accident occurred near K.R. Nagar. He denied respondent counsel's suggestions that the rider lacked valid licensing, the vehicle was uninsured, or that rider negligence (due to rain) caused the accident. Petitioner also refuted allegations that medical bills were fabricated, that he suffered no disability, or that he currently earns more than pre-accident income. The cross-examination covered liability against Cholamandalam General Insurance Co. Ltd. and allegations of false FIS filing and forged documents. No re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case