M RANGASWAMY vs SIDDESH — 10/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080000272025
e-Filing Number
04-01-2025
Filing Number
10/2025
Filing Date
04-Jan-2025
Registration No
10/2025
Registration Date
06-Jan-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M RANGASWAMY
Adv. M B GANESHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SIDDESH
-
2.SBI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Lok Adalath accepted the parties' joint settlement memo and disposed of the petition, directing SBI General Insurance Company Limited to pay M Rangaswamy ₹2,93,000 as compensation for injuries and medical expenses incurred. The court found the voluntary compromise legally enforceable and released the entire amount to the petitioner, deeming him capable of handling the funds given the nature of his injuries and documented medical costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
06-Mar-2026
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Jan-2026
Settlement
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
13-Dec-2025
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
14-Nov-2025
A.D.R.
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
25-Sep-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
18-Jul-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
29-May-2025
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
08-Apr-2025
Appearance Of Party
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Feb-2025
Notice
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
10-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 10/2025
The Lok Adalath accepted the parties' joint settlement memo and disposed of the petition, directing SBI General Insurance Company Limited to pay M Rangaswamy ₹2,93,000 as compensation for injuries and medical expenses incurred. The court found the voluntary compromise legally enforceable and released the entire amount to the petitioner, deeming him capable of handling the funds given the nature of his injuries and documented medical costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts