JAGADISH.K vs MADHUSUDHAN — 2/2025
Case under Under Order 21 Rule 2 of Cpc Section .. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAMS080000132025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11/2025
Filing Date
07-01-2025
Registration No
2/2025
Registration Date
15-01-2025
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAGADISH.K
Adv. K.B.NAGESHA
Respondent(s)
MADHUSUDHAN
SIDDARAMU H S
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Disposed
NOTICE
NOTICE
NOTICE
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-02-2026 | NOTICE | |
| 03-01-2026 | NOTICE | |
| 06-11-2025 | NOTICE | |
| 23-08-2025 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Judge of the District Court at Mysuru dismissed an execution petition for non-prosecution under CPC Order 17 Rules 2-3 and Section 9, as the Judgment Debtor (DHr) remained absent despite being called for hearing and failed to take any steps to contest the petition. The court found no grounds to adjourn further, concluding that the DHr showed no interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Judge of the District Court at Mysuru dismissed an execution petition for non-prosecution under CPC Order 17 Rules 2-3 and Section 9, as the Judgment Debtor (DHr) remained absent despite being called for hearing and failed to take any steps to contest the petition. The court found no grounds to adjourn further, concluding that the DHr showed no interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts