K. Honnaraju, Badge No.2299, Rural Depot-2, Mysore vs Divisional Controller, KSRTC, Mysore Rural Division, Bannimantap, Mysuru. — 197/2018

Case under Under Section 10 1 C of the Industrial Disputes Act Section 10(1)(c)(d). Status: PRL. STAGE. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Ref. - Reference u/s 10-1-d of ID Act

CNR: KAMS060002442018

PRL. STAGE

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

197/2018

Filing Date

18-08-2018

Registration No

197/2018

Registration Date

18-08-2018

Court

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU

Judge

618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

Acts & Sections

UNDER SECTION 10 1 C OF THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT Section 10(1)(c)(d)

Petitioner(s)

K. Honnaraju, Badge No.2299, Rural Depot-2, Mysore

Respondent(s)

Divisional Controller, KSRTC, Mysore Rural Division, Bannimantap, Mysuru.

Hearing History

Judge: 618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

07-03-2026

PRL. STAGE

27-02-2026

PRL. STAGE

05-02-2026

Restored

05-02-2026

ORDERS

05-02-2026

PRL. STAGE

Interim Orders

19-11-2018
Judgment

Summary: An Industrial Tribunal in Mysore rejected the industrial dispute reference filed by a driver (first party) challenging a 2011 punishment order issued by his employer (second party). The tribunal found the first party failed to file any claim statement or evidence to prove the punishment order was illegal or improper, and upheld the employer's disciplinary action as justified. Both parties were ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: An Industrial Tribunal in Mysore rejected the industrial dispute reference filed by a driver (first party) challenging a 2011 punishment order issued by his employer (second party). The tribunal found the first party failed to file any claim statement or evidence to prove the punishment order was illegal or improper, and upheld the employer's disciplinary action as justified. Both parties were ordered to bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case