D.LOKESHA, DRIVER-CUM-CONDUCTOR, BADGE NO.657, H.N.PURA UNIT, PRESENTLY WORKING AT HASSAN UNIT-2 vs THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLER, KSRTC, HASSAN DIVISION, HASSAN. — 103/2023

Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section 10-1-d. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Ref. - Reference u/s 10-1-d of ID Act

CNR: KAMS060001492023

Filing Number

103/2023

Filing Date

23-Dec-2023

Registration No

103/2023

Registration Date

23-Dec-2023

Court

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU

Judge

618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act Section 10-1-d

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.D.LOKESHA, DRIVER-CUM-CONDUCTOR, BADGE NO.657, H.N.PURA UNIT, PRESENTLY WORKING AT HASSAN UNIT-2

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLER, KSRTC, HASSAN DIVISION, HASSAN.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Reserved For Award

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Settlement or Compromise

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Settlement or Compromise

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Settlement or Compromise

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  8. 29-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  9. 05-Nov-2025

    Reserved For Award

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  10. 09-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  11. 10-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    The court rejected D. Lokesha's claim against KSRTC Hassan Division. The respondent's counsel presented evidence that on 12.02.2020, inspection officers found only 5 passengers on a bus route where more were expected, and recovered fare collections signed by both the petitioner and passengers, establishing that Lokesha had attempted to defraud the organization. The court found the petitioner guilty of misconduct and denied his claim for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 10-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  13. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  14. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  15. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  16. 03-Apr-2025

    OrdersView PDF

  17. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  18. 05-Mar-2025

    Orders

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  19. 05-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  20. 08-Jan-2025

    IssueView PDF

  21. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  22. 02-Jan-2025

    Issues.

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  23. 04-Dec-2024

    Issues.

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  24. 06-Nov-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  25. 11-Sep-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  26. 07-Aug-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  27. 10-Jul-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  28. 19-Jun-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  29. 07-May-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  30. 03-Apr-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  31. 05-Mar-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  32. 07-Feb-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  33. 10-Jan-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  34. 26-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 23-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 103/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected D. Lokesha's claim against KSRTC Hassan Division. The respondent's counsel presented evidence that on 12.02.2020, inspection officers found only 5 passengers on a bus route where more were expected, and recovered fare collections signed by both the petitioner and passengers, establishing that Lokesha had attempted to defraud the organization. The court found the petitioner guilty of misconduct and denied his claim for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case