SRI.S.ANANDA, DRIVER, BADGE NO.1784, KOLLEGALA UNIT vs THE DIVISSIONAL CONTROLER, KSRTC, CHAMARAJANAGARA DIVISION, CHAMARAJANAGARA. — 36/2022
Case under Under Section 10 1 C of the Industrial Disputes Act Section 10-1-c-d. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
Ref. - Reference u/s 10-1-d of ID Act
CNR: KAMS060001382022
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
36/2022
Filing Date
19-07-2022
Registration No
36/2022
Registration Date
19-07-2022
Court
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU
Judge
618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRI.S.ANANDA, DRIVER, BADGE NO.1784, KOLLEGALA UNIT
Respondent(s)
THE DIVISSIONAL CONTROLER, KSRTC, CHAMARAJANAGARA DIVISION, CHAMARAJANAGARA.
Hearing History
Judge: 618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 28-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Tribunal at Mysuru ruled that the domestic enquiry conducted against S. Ananda, a KSRTC driver, was not fair, proper, and valid. The Tribunal found multiple procedural violations including: an unexplained 20-year delay between the alleged misconduct (1991-94) and punishment order (2018), failure to provide the employee with charge sheet documents, no opportunity to submit a written reply, and discrepancies between the enquiry order sheet and actual proceedings. The case is now posted for second party evidence on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Tribunal at Mysuru ruled that the domestic enquiry conducted against S. Ananda, a KSRTC driver, was not fair, proper, and valid. The Tribunal found multiple procedural violations including: an unexplained 20-year delay between the alleged misconduct (1991-94) and punishment order (2018), failure to provide the employee with charge sheet documents, no opportunity to submit a written reply, and discrepancies between the enquiry order sheet and actual proceedings. The case is now posted for second party evidence on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts