NANDEESHA.S. MAJOR, MALMAN, KANIYARA RAMAMANDIRA. vs THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, GOVT.OF KARNATAKA, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALURU-560 001. — 28/2022
Case under Under Section 10 1 C of the Industrial Disputes Act Section 10-1-c-d. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
Ref. - Reference u/s 10-1-d of ID Act
CNR: KAMS060001242022
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
28/2022
Filing Date
23-06-2022
Registration No
28/2022
Registration Date
23-06-2022
Court
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU
Judge
618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NANDEESHA.S. MAJOR, MALMAN, KANIYARA RAMAMANDIRA.
Y.S.RAGHU, ASST. HONGALLY.
SHIVANNA, ASST.RAMMANAHALLY, WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE.
RAVI.H.C.
RAMESH.H.N. ASST. HONGALLI YANTHRAGARA.
BASAVEGOWDA, ASST. HONGALLI.
M.ASHOKA. ASST. HONGALLI PURIFICATION CENTRE.
REVANNA, ASST. WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE, RAMMANAHALLY.
SMT.PARVATHI, ASST. HONGALLY KENDRA.
CHOWDAIAH, ASST. WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE, RAMMANAHALLY.
ERAPPA, ASST., HONGALLI YANTHRAGARA.
SHIVANNA, ASST., HONGALLY YANTHRAGARA.
VIVEKA.M.S. RAMMANAHALLY WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE.
BALARAMA.N. PUMP OPERATOR, B.P.S.
JAVARAIAH, ASST.RAMMANAHALLY WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE.
CHELUVARAJU.C. ASST., WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE, RAMMANAHALLY.
RAGHAVENDRA.S. WALLMAN, MANDIMOHALLA, MYSURU.
MANJU.C. HONGALLY YANTHRAGARA.
PUTTABUDDI.C. ASST., WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE, RAMMANAHALLY.
CHANDREGOWDA, ASST., BELAGOLA PUMP HOUSE
MALLESH, INCHARGE CASHIER,
SHIVANNA, ASST., HONGALLY YANTHRAGARA.
GANESHA.K.B. ASST., HONGALLY YANTHRAGARA.
RAJASHEKARA.H.S. ASST., HONGALLY YANTHRAGARA.
BALARAMA.B. ASST., HONGALLY YANTHRAGARA.
MUNAVAR AHAMMED SIDDIKI, B.P.S.
MAHADEVA.S.
THAMMANNA.H.C. INCHARGE WATER INSPECTOR.WARD NO.4722.
SHIVANNA, ASST.WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE, RAMMANAHALLY.
RAJESHA.P. WALLMAN, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSURU.
RAJU.H. VANIVILASA WATER PURIFY, MYSURU.
MAHADEVA. ASST., HONGALLY.
NAGAMMA, WALLMAN, K.H.TANK, KALYANAGIRI.
MANJUNATHA.B.M. ASST., HONGALLY YANTHRAGARA.
MANJUNATHA.R. WALLMAN, VIJAYANAGARA.
KEMPEGOWDA.G. ASST., B.P.S.
JAFAR SHARIFF, INCHARGE CASHIER, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSURU.
KUMARA.P. WALLMAN. YARAGANAHALLY SERVICE CENTRE.
HEMAKUMARA.T. ASST., KANIYARA RAMAMANDIRA, KESARE.
MAHADEVA, WALLMAN, ASST. KANIYARA RAMAMANDIRA, MYSURU.
PARASHIVAMURTHY, MAPAKA, WARD NO.15, KANIYARA RAMAMANDIRA, MYSURU.
SRIKANTAMURTHY, WALLMAN, N.R.MOHALLA SERVICE CENTRE.
CHANDRASHEKAR.C. WALLMAN, KANIYARA RAMAMANDIRA, N.R.MOHALLA SERVICE CENTRE, MYSURU.
SHANKARA, ASST., MELAPURA CENTRE.
Respondent(s)
THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, GOVT.OF KARNATAKA, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALURU-560 001.
THE COMMISSIONER, CORPORATION OF MYSURU, SAYYAJIRAO ROAD,MYSURU-570 001.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, VANIVILASA WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE BOARD, YADAVAGIRI, MYSURU-570 020.
THE ASST.,EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, VANIVILASA WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE BOARD, EAST DIVISION, YADAVAGIRI,
Hearing History
Judge: 618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 27-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 29-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Tribunal at Mysuru ruled that it has jurisdiction to entertain a dispute regarding the regularization of 44 contract workers employed by Mysuru City Corporation at the Vani Vilas Water Supply Board. The tribunal determined that Mysuru City Corporation qualifies as an "industry" and the workers constitute "workmen" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, thus establishing that an industrial dispute exists. The case will proceed to adjudication on merits regarding the workers' entitlement to service regularization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Tribunal at Mysuru ruled that it has jurisdiction to entertain a dispute regarding the regularization of 44 contract workers employed by Mysuru City Corporation at the Vani Vilas Water Supply Board. The tribunal determined that Mysuru City Corporation qualifies as an "industry" and the workers constitute "workmen" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, thus establishing that an industrial dispute exists. The case will proceed to adjudication on merits regarding the workers' entitlement to service regularization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts