NANDEESHA.S. MAJOR, MALMAN, KANIYARA RAMAMANDIRA. vs THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, GOVT.OF KARNATAKA, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALURU-560 001. — 28/2022

Case under Under Section 10 1 C of the Industrial Disputes Act Section 10-1-c-d. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 03-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Ref. - Reference u/s 10-1-d of ID Act

CNR: KAMS060001242022

Filing Number

28/2022

Filing Date

23-Jun-2022

Registration No

28/2022

Registration Date

23-Jun-2022

Court

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU

Judge

618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Section 10 1 C of the Industrial Disputes Act Section 10-1-c-d

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NANDEESHA.S. MAJOR, MALMAN, KANIYARA RAMAMANDIRA.

  2. 2.Y.S.RAGHU, ASST. HONGALLY.

  3. 3.SHIVANNA, ASST.RAMMANAHALLY, WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE.

  4. 4.RAVI.H.C.

  5. 5.RAMESH.H.N. ASST. HONGALLI YANTHRAGARA.

  6. 6.BASAVEGOWDA, ASST. HONGALLI.

  7. 7.M.ASHOKA. ASST. HONGALLI PURIFICATION CENTRE.

  8. 8.REVANNA, ASST. WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE, RAMMANAHALLY.

  9. 9.SMT.PARVATHI, ASST. HONGALLY KENDRA.

  10. 10.CHOWDAIAH, ASST. WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE, RAMMANAHALLY.

  11. 11.ERAPPA, ASST., HONGALLI YANTHRAGARA.

  12. 12.SHIVANNA, ASST., HONGALLY YANTHRAGARA.

  13. 13.VIVEKA.M.S. RAMMANAHALLY WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE.

  14. 14.BALARAMA.N. PUMP OPERATOR, B.P.S.

  15. 15.JAVARAIAH, ASST.RAMMANAHALLY WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE.

  16. 16.CHELUVARAJU.C. ASST., WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE, RAMMANAHALLY.

  17. 17.RAGHAVENDRA.S. WALLMAN, MANDIMOHALLA, MYSURU.

  18. 18.MANJU.C. HONGALLY YANTHRAGARA.

  19. 19.PUTTABUDDI.C. ASST., WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE, RAMMANAHALLY.

  20. 20.CHANDREGOWDA, ASST., BELAGOLA PUMP HOUSE

  21. 21.MALLESH, INCHARGE CASHIER,

  22. 22.SHIVANNA, ASST., HONGALLY YANTHRAGARA.

  23. 23.GANESHA.K.B. ASST., HONGALLY YANTHRAGARA.

  24. 24.RAJASHEKARA.H.S. ASST., HONGALLY YANTHRAGARA.

  25. 25.BALARAMA.B. ASST., HONGALLY YANTHRAGARA.

  26. 26.MUNAVAR AHAMMED SIDDIKI, B.P.S.

  27. 27.MAHADEVA.S.

  28. 28.THAMMANNA.H.C. INCHARGE WATER INSPECTOR.WARD NO.4722.

  29. 29.SHIVANNA, ASST.WATER PURIFICATION CENTRE, RAMMANAHALLY.

  30. 30.RAJESHA.P. WALLMAN, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSURU.

  31. 31.RAJU.H. VANIVILASA WATER PURIFY, MYSURU.

  32. 32.MAHADEVA. ASST., HONGALLY.

  33. 33.NAGAMMA, WALLMAN, K.H.TANK, KALYANAGIRI.

  34. 34.MANJUNATHA.B.M. ASST., HONGALLY YANTHRAGARA.

  35. 35.MANJUNATHA.R. WALLMAN, VIJAYANAGARA.

  36. 36.KEMPEGOWDA.G. ASST., B.P.S.

  37. 37.JAFAR SHARIFF, INCHARGE CASHIER, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSURU.

  38. 38.KUMARA.P. WALLMAN. YARAGANAHALLY SERVICE CENTRE.

  39. 39.HEMAKUMARA.T. ASST., KANIYARA RAMAMANDIRA, KESARE.

  40. 40.MAHADEVA, WALLMAN, ASST. KANIYARA RAMAMANDIRA, MYSURU.

  41. 41.PARASHIVAMURTHY, MAPAKA, WARD NO.15, KANIYARA RAMAMANDIRA, MYSURU.

  42. 42.SRIKANTAMURTHY, WALLMAN, N.R.MOHALLA SERVICE CENTRE.

  43. 43.CHANDRASHEKAR.C. WALLMAN, KANIYARA RAMAMANDIRA, N.R.MOHALLA SERVICE CENTRE, MYSURU.

  44. 44.SHANKARA, ASST., MELAPURA CENTRE.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, GOVT.OF KARNATAKA, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALURU-560 001.

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER, CORPORATION OF MYSURU, SAYYAJIRAO ROAD,MYSURU-570 001.

  3. 3.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, VANIVILASA WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE BOARD, YADAVAGIRI, MYSURU-570 020.

  4. 4.THE ASST.,EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, VANIVILASA WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE BOARD, EAST DIVISION, YADAVAGIRI,

Case History

  1. 03-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  5. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  6. 29-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  7. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  8. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  9. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  10. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  11. 05-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  12. 02-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  13. 28-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  14. 10-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  15. 13-Feb-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary The Industrial Tribunal at Mysuru ruled that it has jurisdiction to entertain a dispute regarding the regularization of 44 contract workers employed by Mysuru City Corporation at the Vani Vilas Water Supply Board. The tribunal determined that Mysuru City Corporation qualifies as an "industry" and the workers constitute "workmen" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, thus establishing that an industrial dispute exists. The case will proceed to adjudication on merits regarding the workers' entitlement to service regularization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  17. 03-Feb-2025

    Orders

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  18. 27-Jan-2025

    Orders

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  19. 06-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  20. 16-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  21. 02-Dec-2024

    IssueView PDF

  22. 02-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  23. 14-Nov-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  24. 14-Nov-2024

    Issues.

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  25. 28-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  26. 04-Sep-2024

    OrdersView PDF

  27. 04-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  28. 19-Aug-2024

    Orders

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  29. 31-Jul-2024

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  30. 02-Jul-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  31. 10-Jun-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  32. 16-May-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  33. 01-Apr-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  34. 19-Feb-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  35. 16-Jan-2024

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  36. 28-Nov-2023

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  37. 06-Oct-2023

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  38. 30-Aug-2023

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  39. 18-Jul-2023

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  40. 31-May-2023

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  41. 17-Apr-2023

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  42. 27-Feb-2023

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  43. 27-Dec-2022

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  44. 19-Nov-2022

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  45. 04-Nov-2022

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  46. 02-Sep-2022

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  47. 27-Jul-2022

    Prl. Stage

    Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

  48. 27-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 23-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Industrial Tribunal at Mysuru ruled that it has jurisdiction to entertain a dispute regarding the regularization of 44 contract workers employed by Mysuru City Corporation at the Vani Vilas Water Supply Board. The tribunal determined that Mysuru City Corporation qualifies as an "industry" and the workers constitute "workmen" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, thus establishing that an industrial dispute exists. The case will proceed to adjudication on merits regarding the workers' entitlement to service regularization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case