NAGANNA.S. DRIVER, BADGE NO.19258, VIJAYANAGARA UNIT vs THE DIVISSIONAL CONTROLLER, KSRTC, MYSURU NAGARA VIBHAGA, MYSURU. — 48/2023
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section 10-1-d. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
Ref. - Reference u/s 10-1-d of ID Act
CNR: KAMS060000872023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
48/2023
Filing Date
27-09-2023
Registration No
48/2023
Registration Date
27-09-2023
Court
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU
Judge
618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAGANNA.S. DRIVER, BADGE NO.19258, VIJAYANAGARA UNIT
Respondent(s)
THE DIVISSIONAL CONTROLLER, KSRTC, MYSURU NAGARA VIBHAGA, MYSURU.
Hearing History
Judge: 618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore
Disposed
RESERVED FOR AWARD
PRL. STAGE
PRL. STAGE
PRL. STAGE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | RESERVED FOR AWARD | |
| 07-03-2026 | PRL. STAGE | |
| 28-02-2026 | PRL. STAGE | |
| 16-02-2026 | PRL. STAGE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Industrial Tribunal at Mysuru upheld the validity of a domestic enquiry against KSRTC bus driver Sri. S. Naganna, who fatally hit a passenger in December 2018. The tribunal found the enquiry was fair and proper, conducted per C&D regulations with full natural justice principles, including charges notification, document access, cross-examination opportunity, and defense statement recording. The case proceeds to merit hearing to address perversity allegations against the enquiry officer's findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Industrial Tribunal at Mysuru upheld the validity of a domestic enquiry against KSRTC bus driver Sri. S. Naganna, who fatally hit a passenger in December 2018. The tribunal found the enquiry was fair and proper, conducted per C&D regulations with full natural justice principles, including charges notification, document access, cross-examination opportunity, and defense statement recording. The case proceeds to merit hearing to address perversity allegations against the enquiry officer's findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts