SRI.RAJEGOWDA, RETIRED CONDUCTOR, BADGE NO.1396, RURAL UNIT-2. vs The Divisional Controller KSRTC Mysuru Rural, Mysuru — 58/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section 10-1-d. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
Ref. - Reference u/s 10-1-d of ID Act
CNR: KAMS060000642025
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
58/2025
Filing Date
23-04-2025
Registration No
58/2025
Registration Date
23-04-2025
Court
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU
Judge
618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRI.RAJEGOWDA, RETIRED CONDUCTOR, BADGE NO.1396, RURAL UNIT-2.
Respondent(s)
The Divisional Controller KSRTC Mysuru Rural, Mysuru
Hearing History
Judge: 618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 28-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary On 10-11-2025, the witness was examined and sworn affidavit was administered in this case (Ref No. 58-2025, WW-1). The court recorded examination of the first party's witness (CNB representative) and marked four documentary exhibits (W-1 to W-4) including government order, notice, payment receipt of Rs. 87,854, and departmental officer's application. The second party's counsel was given opportunity to cross-examine. No further examination was ordered, and the witness testimony was recorded as admitted by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary On 10-11-2025, the witness was examined and sworn affidavit was administered in this case (Ref No. 58-2025, WW-1). The court recorded examination of the first party's witness (CNB representative) and marked four documentary exhibits (W-1 to W-4) including government order, notice, payment receipt of Rs. 87,854, and departmental officer's application. The second party's counsel was given opportunity to cross-examine. No further examination was ordered, and the witness testimony was recorded as admitted by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts