SRI.RAJEGOWDA, RETIRED CONDUCTOR, BADGE NO.1396, RURAL UNIT-2. vs The Divisional Controller KSRTC Mysuru Rural, Mysuru — 58/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section 10-1-d. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

Ref. - Reference u/s 10-1-d of ID Act

CNR: KAMS060000642025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

07th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

58/2025

Filing Date

23-04-2025

Registration No

58/2025

Registration Date

23-04-2025

Court

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU

Judge

618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

Acts & Sections

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT Section 10-1-d

Petitioner(s)

SRI.RAJEGOWDA, RETIRED CONDUCTOR, BADGE NO.1396, RURAL UNIT-2.

Respondent(s)

The Divisional Controller KSRTC Mysuru Rural, Mysuru

Hearing History

Judge: 618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

06-04-2026

EVIDENCE

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

28-02-2026

EVIDENCE

16-02-2026

EVIDENCE

05-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

10-11-2025
Deposition

Summary On 10-11-2025, the witness was examined and sworn affidavit was administered in this case (Ref No. 58-2025, WW-1). The court recorded examination of the first party's witness (CNB representative) and marked four documentary exhibits (W-1 to W-4) including government order, notice, payment receipt of Rs. 87,854, and departmental officer's application. The second party's counsel was given opportunity to cross-examine. No further examination was ordered, and the witness testimony was recorded as admitted by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary On 10-11-2025, the witness was examined and sworn affidavit was administered in this case (Ref No. 58-2025, WW-1). The court recorded examination of the first party's witness (CNB representative) and marked four documentary exhibits (W-1 to W-4) including government order, notice, payment receipt of Rs. 87,854, and departmental officer's application. The second party's counsel was given opportunity to cross-examine. No further examination was ordered, and the witness testimony was recorded as admitted by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case