K.V.UMESHA, CONDUCTOR, BADGE NO.10020, MADIKERI UNIT. vs THE DIVISSIONAL TRAFFIC CONTROLLER AND DISCIPLINARY OFFICER, KSRTC, PUTTUR DIVISION, PUTTUR. — 31/2023
Case under Under Section 10 1 C of the Industrial Disputes Act Section 10-1-c-d. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
Ref. - Reference u/s 10-1-d of ID Act
CNR: KAMS060000642023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
31/2023
Filing Date
22-08-2023
Registration No
31/2023
Registration Date
22-08-2023
Court
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU
Judge
618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.V.UMESHA, CONDUCTOR, BADGE NO.10020, MADIKERI UNIT.
Respondent(s)
THE DIVISSIONAL TRAFFIC CONTROLLER AND DISCIPLINARY OFFICER, KSRTC, PUTTUR DIVISION, PUTTUR.
Hearing History
Judge: 618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore
Disposed
RESERVED FOR AWARD
Settlement or Compromise
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | RESERVED FOR AWARD | |
| 24-02-2026 | Settlement or Compromise | |
| 28-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The court heard witness testimony on 28.01.2026 in this disciplinary case (Ref No. 31/2023). The second party's counsel presented documentary evidence including authorization letters, charge sheets, medical certificates, and a punishment order dated 23.06.2015, which were marked as exhibits M-1 through M-9. The court found the evidence credible and dismissed the first party's petition challenging the disciplinary action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court heard witness testimony on 28.01.2026 in this disciplinary case (Ref No. 31/2023). The second party's counsel presented documentary evidence including authorization letters, charge sheets, medical certificates, and a punishment order dated 23.06.2015, which were marked as exhibits M-1 through M-9. The court found the evidence credible and dismissed the first party's petition challenging the disciplinary action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts