U.B.YOGESH, DRIVER-CUM-CONDUCTOR, BADGE NO.125, CHIKKAMAGALUR UNIT. vs The Divisional Controller KSRTC Chikkamagalur Division Chikkamagalur — 44/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section 10-1-d. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
Ref. - Reference u/s 10-1-d of ID Act
CNR: KAMS060000492025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
44/2025
Filing Date
02-04-2025
Registration No
44/2025
Registration Date
02-04-2025
Court
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU
Judge
618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
U.B.YOGESH, DRIVER-CUM-CONDUCTOR, BADGE NO.125, CHIKKAMAGALUR UNIT.
Respondent(s)
The Divisional Controller KSRTC Chikkamagalur Division Chikkamagalur
Hearing History
Judge: 618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore
Disposed
RESERVED FOR AWARD
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | RESERVED FOR AWARD | |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 08-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The court (Industrial Tribunal, Mysore) recorded the testimony of the second party's witness on 12.02.2026, admitted various documentary evidence (marked as Exhibits M-1 through M-21), and found the inquiry to be conducted fairly and justly. The first party's counsel was given adequate time to cross-examine the witness, and no further examination was required; the court concluded that the proceedings were conducted in accordance with proper legal procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court (Industrial Tribunal, Mysore) recorded the testimony of the second party's witness on 12.02.2026, admitted various documentary evidence (marked as Exhibits M-1 through M-21), and found the inquiry to be conducted fairly and justly. The first party's counsel was given adequate time to cross-examine the witness, and no further examination was required; the court concluded that the proceedings were conducted in accordance with proper legal procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts