THE PRESIDENT, MYSORE DIVISION INDUSTRIAL WORKERS GENERAL UNION (A.I.T.U.C.), SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSO vs M/S.MAYABHANDAR DOORS LTD., BOOGATHAHALLI, MYSORE. — 19/2023

Case under Under Section 10 1 C of the Industrial Disputes Act Section 10-1-c-d. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

Ref. - Reference u/s 10-1-d of ID Act

CNR: KAMS060000482023

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

22nd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

19/2023

Filing Date

20-07-2023

Registration No

19/2023

Registration Date

20-07-2023

Court

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU

Judge

618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

Acts & Sections

UNDER SECTION 10 1 C OF THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT Section 10-1-c-d

Petitioner(s)

THE PRESIDENT, MYSORE DIVISION INDUSTRIAL WORKERS GENERAL UNION (A.I.T.U.C.), SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSO

Respondent(s)

M/S.MAYABHANDAR DOORS LTD., BOOGATHAHALLI, MYSORE.

Hearing History

Judge: 618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

08-04-2026

EVIDENCE

24-03-2026

EVIDENCE

23-03-2026

EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

16-04-2025
Deposition
24-03-2026
Deposition

Summary On 24-03-2026, the witness was examined and oath administered. The first party's counsel examined the witness and submitted main evidence; documentary exhibits including a memorandum of settlement (20.07.2023), certified copy of Labour Officer's order sheet, and failure report (21.01.2023) were marked as exhibits. The second party's counsel cross-examined the witness, whose evidence was considered admissible in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary On 24-03-2026, the witness was examined and oath administered. The first party's counsel examined the witness and submitted main evidence; documentary exhibits including a memorandum of settlement (20.07.2023), certified copy of Labour Officer's order sheet, and failure report (21.01.2023) were marked as exhibits. The second party's counsel cross-examined the witness, whose evidence was considered admissible in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case