RAJANNA, RETIRED TRAFFIC CONTROLLER, K.R.NAGARA UNIT. vs The Divisional Controller KSRTC Mysuru Rural Division Mysuru — 35/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section 10-1-d. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

Ref. - Reference u/s 10-1-d of ID Act

CNR: KAMS060000392025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

05th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

35/2025

Filing Date

07-03-2025

Registration No

35/2025

Registration Date

07-03-2025

Court

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU

Judge

618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

Acts & Sections

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT Section 10-1-d

Petitioner(s)

RAJANNA, RETIRED TRAFFIC CONTROLLER, K.R.NAGARA UNIT.

Respondent(s)

The Divisional Controller KSRTC Mysuru Rural Division Mysuru

Hearing History

Judge: 618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore

06-04-2026

EVIDENCE

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

28-02-2026

EVIDENCE

16-02-2026

EVIDENCE

05-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

27-10-2025
Deposition
14-11-2025
Deposition

Summary: On 14-11-2025, the court examined the witness and administered an oath. The first party (NCB representative) presented the main examination, and eight documentary exhibits (government notice, money difference of ₹1,17,134, demand orders totaling ₹2,95,652 and ₹2,14,337, payment receipts, and notices) were admitted into evidence. The second party's counsel cross-examined the witness, and no further cross-examination was required. The case proceeded with witness examination and documentary evidence recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: On 14-11-2025, the court examined the witness and administered an oath. The first party (NCB representative) presented the main examination, and eight documentary exhibits (government notice, money difference of ₹1,17,134, demand orders totaling ₹2,95,652 and ₹2,14,337, payment receipts, and notices) were admitted into evidence. The second party's counsel cross-examined the witness, and no further cross-examination was required. The case proceeded with witness examination and documentary evidence recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case