YALLAGURUDAPPA, CONDUCTOR, BADGE NO.5281, CHIKKAMAGALUR UNIT. vs THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLER, KSRTC, CHIKKAMAGALUR DIVISION, CHIKKAMAGALUR. — 11/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section 10-1-d. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
Ref. - Reference u/s 10-1-d of ID Act
CNR: KAMS060000242024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11/2024
Filing Date
10-06-2024
Registration No
11/2024
Registration Date
10-06-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL COURT, MYSURU
Judge
618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YALLAGURUDAPPA, CONDUCTOR, BADGE NO.5281, CHIKKAMAGALUR UNIT.
Respondent(s)
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLER, KSRTC, CHIKKAMAGALUR DIVISION, CHIKKAMAGALUR.
Hearing History
Judge: 618-Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal Mysore
Disposed
RESERVED FOR AWARD
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | RESERVED FOR AWARD | |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 05-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary This Industrial Court judgment (Ref. No. 11/2024) in Kannada addresses a disciplinary case against the first party. The court found that the first party's alleged unauthorized absence and procedural violations (improper documentation, false testimony) were substantiated. The court upheld the disciplinary action and ordered that the first party remains liable for damages of Rs. 7,74,288/- to the second party (the institution), rejecting the first party's arguments of procedural irregularities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This Industrial Court judgment (Ref. No. 11/2024) in Kannada addresses a disciplinary case against the first party. The court found that the first party's alleged unauthorized absence and procedural violations (improper documentation, false testimony) were substantiated. The court upheld the disciplinary action and ordered that the first party remains liable for damages of Rs. 7,74,288/- to the second party (the institution), rejecting the first party's arguments of procedural irregularities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts