M.D SANDEEP PAWAR vs DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, KSRTC MYSURU — 26/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section U/S10(1). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
Ref - Reference
CNR: KAMS050000592025
Filing Number
26/2025
Filing Date
08-Dec-2025
Registration No
26/2025
Registration Date
08-Dec-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, MYSURU
Judge
614-Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M.D SANDEEP PAWAR
Adv. Authorized Representative
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, KSRTC MYSURU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Lok-Adalath accepted a joint settlement memo filed by both parties, who were present before the conciliators. The case (Ref. 26/2025) was settled based on the agreed terms of the joint memo after both parties consented to its contents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
-
13-Mar-2026
Referred to Lok-Adalath
Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence
Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
-
28-Feb-2026
Issues
Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
-
23-Feb-2026
For Settlement / Compromise
Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
-
12-Feb-2026
Call on
Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
-
02-Feb-2026
Call on
Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
-
22-Jan-2026
Call on
Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
-
14-Jan-2026
Call on
Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
-
13-Jan-2026
Call on
Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
-
05-Jan-2026
Call on
Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
-
22-Dec-2025
Notice
Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
-
09-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 26/2025
The Lok-Adalath accepted a joint settlement memo filed by both parties, who were present before the conciliators. The case (Ref. 26/2025) was settled based on the agreed terms of the joint memo after both parties consented to its contents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts