Brungesha H.A s/o Ananda Murthy vs M/s Reid and Taylor (India) Limited — 7/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section 10(1)(c). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th March 2026.
Ref - Reference
CNR: KAMS050000212024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7/2024
Filing Date
30-05-2024
Registration No
7/2024
Registration Date
30-05-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, MYSURU
Judge
614-Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Brungesha H.A s/o Ananda Murthy
Adv. L.Muralidhar Peshwa
Naganna S/o Ningappa
Adv. L.Muralidhar Peshwa
Mahadevappa M S/o Mahadevappa
Adv. L.Muralidhar Peshwa
K.H Pradeeo S/o LAte.C.V.Hanumathaiah
Adv. L.Muralidhar Peshwa
H.P Naveen Kumar S/o Late.H.M.Prabhu
Adv. L.Muralidhar Peshwa
Komala K W/o Manjunath K
Adv. L.Muralidhar Peshwa
Sundaresh M S/o Madappa
Adv. L.Muralidhar Peshwa
S.Jagadeesha S/o Shibananjaiah
Adv. L.Muralidhar Peshwa
Deshi Gowda S/o Eregowda
Adv. L.Muralidhar Peshwa
Chikkamahadeva S/o Siddaiah
Adv. L.Muralidhar Peshwa
Nagaraju M S/o Late.Mahadeva
Adv. L.Muralidhar Peshwa
Siddappa S/o Kempanna
Adv. L.Muralidhar Peshwa
Mahadeva S/o Madaiah
Adv. L.Muralidhar Peshwa
Respondent(s)
M/s Reid and Taylor (India) Limited
Krihaan Texchem Pvt.Ltd
Adv. J.Purushotham
Hearing History
Judge: 614-Presiding Officer Labour Court Mysore
Disposed
Award
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Award | |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 04-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 28-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
The Mysore Labor Court (Ref: 7/2024) examined a settlement agreement made under Industrial Disputes Act Sections 12(3) and 18(3) between company management and 565 workers, providing Rs. 80,000 compensation and gratuity payments. The court found the settlement valid as a proper voluntary agreement between employer and workers, noting that the management's decision to provide ex-gratia relief rather than statutory retrenchment compensation was within its discretion and did not violate labor laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Mysore Labor Court (Ref: 7/2024) examined a settlement agreement made under Industrial Disputes Act Sections 12(3) and 18(3) between company management and 565 workers, providing Rs. 80,000 compensation and gratuity payments. The court found the settlement valid as a proper voluntary agreement between employer and workers, noting that the management's decision to provide ex-gratia relief rather than statutory retrenchment compensation was within its discretion and did not violate labor laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts